Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Singapore should be ashamed of lashings

  • News
  • 3 Sep 2020

Originally published in The Times, 3 September 2020

Yuen Ye Ming, a 31-year-old British man from London, was caned 24 times in Singapore’s Changi prison a fortnight ago for supplying drugs to his friends.

Yuen was strapped naked to a frame and thrashed. He was just one among hundreds of offenders whipped every year in Singapore. There are no official statistics, but the latest estimate is that its government carried out 1,200 floggings in 2016.

By contrast, whipping for criminal offences was abolished in Britain in 1948. Unsurprisingly, the UK has condemned Yuen’s punishment in the strongest terms. The European Court of Human Rights has said that corporal punishment is inherently degrading.

Caning has been found to be a form of inhuman treatment that breaches the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It is also, arguably, a violation of the UN Convention Against Torture.

But none of this seems to matter to the authorities in Singapore. Over the years, the number of criminal offences in the city-state that incur caning has swelled to more than 35.  Numbers of strokes have escalated while its government legislates for increasingly harsh sentences.

This is despite any conclusive evidence that caning acts as an effective deterrent. It is not even as though caning is imposed in lieu of another penalty – offenders on the receiving end of corporal punishment are still expected to serve out lengthy prison sentences; Yuen was handed a 20-year term.

This is a state where the courts have found that cruel or inhuman punishments are permissible and have rationalised that its own laws trump any universal norms or international values.

Singapore’s government, parliament and courts have all vigorously defended the ability deliberately to inflict intense physical suffering on offenders, even for what in other jurisdictions might be considered relatively minor offences.

For example, bill posting attracts a minimum of three lashes. Foreigners overstaying their visas are liable to the same number. Some offences that result in corporal punishment in Singapore might not even be regarded as crimes in the UK.

Drug addicts, like Yuen, are treated punitively. Repeat users can be sentenced to up to 13 years imprisonment with a minimum of six strokes if consumption is detected.

Although Singapore boasts of being one of the safest places in the world to live, it comes at considerable cost to human dignity. In the UK, even the staunchest supporter of tougher sentences is likely to balk at flogging.

Harsh sentences are one thing, but outright brutality is quite another. Singapore’s approach to crime and punishment can never be considered successful until it abides by international standards.

The right to freedom from torture and inhuman treatment is a fundamental one and a value that no civilised state should ignore.

Notes to editors

With Edward Fitzgerald QC, The Death Penalty Project provided free legal assistance to Yuen Ye Ming and his local lawyers in Singapore.

The Death Penalty Project is a charity based at the London law firm Simons Murihead & Burton LLP.

Latest news

Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More
Efforts towards Abolition: Our recent trip to Ghana
Read More
Executive Director of The Death Penalty Project calls on First Deputy Speaker
Read More
There is strong evidence Kenyans want abolition of death penalty
Read More
New research examines Kenyan attitudes towards the death penalty
Read More
As Africa rapidly turns away from capital punishment, is it time for Kenya to abolish this relic of a colonial past?
Read More
Challenge to the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago dismissed by UK Privy Council
Read More
Lescene Edwards's murder conviction overturned by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Read More
A punishment reserved for the poor and marginalised? New study shines light on the profiles and experiences of death row inmates in Bangladesh
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work