Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Death Sentence Quashed and Privy Council Rules Self-Induced Provocation Can Be A Defence to Murder

  • News
  • 13 Feb 2014

Daniel v The State

The appellant, Richard Daniel, was convicted in Trinidad and Tobago of a murder committed during the course of an attempted robbery. He was sentenced to death.  The Death Penalty Project assisted him in his application for appeal against conviction and sentence in December 2013 before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Tim Owen QC and Raj Desai, barristers at Matrix Chambers were instructed pro bonoto represent Mr Daniel before the Privy Council. It was submitted on Daniel’s behalf that the defence of provocation should have been put before the jury, and that his mandatory death sentence was unlawful.

The prosecution had pursued cases of both murder and with felony murder – the latter being murder that is committed during the course of a violent offence, and operates regardless of whether there was any intention to kill.

Although the Privy Council found that there was no scope for any defence of provocation, self-induced or otherwise, to operate against felony murder, it confirmed that self-induced provocation can operate as a defence to murder.  This is so even where it was the defendant’s conduct that generated the deceased’s provocative conduct – in other words, even where the provocation was “self-induced”.

On the facts of this case, since there was no evidence that the appellant had at any time actually lost his self-control, a defence of provocation could not succeed.

Nonetheless, the Privy Council quashed the appellant’s capital sentence and substituted a term of life imprisonment.  It noted that, whilst a mandatory death sentence in the case of murder is lawful in Trinidad; in the case of felony murder, however, a death sentence is discretionary (See Nimrod Miguel v The State). Since it was not known whether the jury at trial convicted the appellant of murder or felony murder, his mandatory sentence of death could not stand.  In any event, it had been more than 5 years since the appellant had been placed on death row, and as such, no sentence of death – even a discretionary one – could be lawfully imposed now upon the appellant.  Hence the Privy Council substituted a sentence of life imprisonment.

 

Photo credit: Thomas Hawk (Flickr, Creative Commons), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

Latest news

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work