Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Lawyer: Popular support a flawed reason for death penalty in Japan

  • DPP in the Media
  • 23 Apr 2021

Originally published in The Ashai Shimbun, March 31, 2021 (read here)

By KANAKO IDA

A London-based lawyer at the forefront of international efforts to abolish capital punishment has criticized Japan for its retention of the death penalty and said the country’s rationale for keeping it is flawed.

“Why has Japan not moved away from the death penalty?” asked Saul Lehrfreund, the 53-year-old co-founder of the Death Penalty Project, an international nongovernmental organization based in London, during an online interview with The Asahi Shimbun in February. “That is the question that needs to be discussed in Japan.”

Capital punishment has been either abolished or suspended in more than two-thirds of countries around the world.

Lehrfreund has visited Japan on at least eight occasions during the past 15 years to give talks and coordinate research studies. In March this year, he served as an online speaker at a meeting titled, “The death penalty: a global perspective,” on the sidelines of the U.N. Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice held in Kyoto.

Lehrfreund joined London-based law firm Simons Muirhead & Burton LLP in 1992 and has since represented numerous defendants facing death sentences in British Commonwealth nations.

Although Britain has abolished the death penalty, some of its former colonies still retain capital punishment and rely on the country’s Judicial Committee of the Privy Council as their highest court of appeal.

Lehrfreund was a student of international human rights law and has made it his life’s work.

He works with lawyers from different nations to devise courtroom strategies and create judicial precedents that constrain the application of the death penalty, including a ruling that found the system of a mandatory death penalty for certain types of crimes is unconstitutional.

“The death penalty is a punishment which is incompatible with fundamental human rights protections,” Lehrfreund said.

He cited a number of problems that accompany the death penalty, such as miscarriages of justice, cruelty, unfair proceedings and the disproportionate concentration of capital punishment on people from marginalized or disadvantaged backgrounds.

Japanese government officials and lawmakers argue the country retains the death penalty because the majority of the public are in favor of it.

Lehrfreund said, however, that a study published by the Death Penalty Project found that Japanese people form their views on the death penalty with limited information.

The 2015 report of the study by researchers Mai Sato and Paul Bacon, titled “The Public Opinion Myth: Why Japan Retains the Death Penalty,” also points out the public’s views are often based on inaccurate perceptions.

“In fact, no countries have abolished the death penalty because of popular demand as reflected in opinion polls,” Lehrfreund said. “Political leadership has always been required to do it.”

Lehrfreund is the father of five children aged between 5 and 24. He said they have let him realize one thing: “A generation who is born in the society where the death penalty does not exist have no expectation that death will be imposed as a punishment.”

Latest news

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work