Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Neil Hernandez v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)

  • News
  • 15 Jul 2014

Death sentence has been quashed in the case of Neil Hernandez by the Trinidad Court of Appeal, on account of inordinate delay in their execution.

Mr Hernandez was, instead, sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment for a double murder, of which he shall serve minimums of 25 years.

The Court of Appeal, however, denied that the execution of a person with mental retardation amounted to cruel and unusual punishment and thus breached fundamental human rights – as has been held in other countries that maintain the death penalty, including the United States. Instead, the Court said that it was a matter for the legislature to determine whether the mentally retarded should be spared capital punishment.

Trinidad and Tobago is also one of the few jurisdictions in the Caribbean for which a mandatory death penalty for murder remains lawful.

Neuropsychological evidence from Dr Alistair Gray, instructed pro bono by the Death Penalty Project and accepted by the Court, showed that Mr Hernandez possessed an IQ of 57, which placed him in the World Health Organisation’s classification of mental retardation.

The Death Penalty Project had previously filed a petition on Mr Hernandez’s behalf before the Privy Council, which, in 2008 remitted Mr Hernandez’s case back to the Trinidad Court of Appeal to consider whether his sentence was compatible with the Trinidad Constitution.

Nonetheless, the Court could not resile from clear authority that there was an unacceptable lapse of time, amounting to over 9 years, during which Mr Hernandez had been waiting execution and thus, if his sentence were now to be carried out, it would amount to cruel and unusual punishment.

Martin Evans of 33 Chancery Lane and Dominic Lewis assisted local counsel in this matter.

The full judgment can be read here.

Latest news

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work