Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Neil Hernandez v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)

  • News
  • 15 Jul 2014

Death sentence has been quashed in the case of Neil Hernandez by the Trinidad Court of Appeal, on account of inordinate delay in their execution.

Mr Hernandez was, instead, sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment for a double murder, of which he shall serve minimums of 25 years.

The Court of Appeal, however, denied that the execution of a person with mental retardation amounted to cruel and unusual punishment and thus breached fundamental human rights – as has been held in other countries that maintain the death penalty, including the United States. Instead, the Court said that it was a matter for the legislature to determine whether the mentally retarded should be spared capital punishment.

Trinidad and Tobago is also one of the few jurisdictions in the Caribbean for which a mandatory death penalty for murder remains lawful.

Neuropsychological evidence from Dr Alistair Gray, instructed pro bono by the Death Penalty Project and accepted by the Court, showed that Mr Hernandez possessed an IQ of 57, which placed him in the World Health Organisation’s classification of mental retardation.

The Death Penalty Project had previously filed a petition on Mr Hernandez’s behalf before the Privy Council, which, in 2008 remitted Mr Hernandez’s case back to the Trinidad Court of Appeal to consider whether his sentence was compatible with the Trinidad Constitution.

Nonetheless, the Court could not resile from clear authority that there was an unacceptable lapse of time, amounting to over 9 years, during which Mr Hernandez had been waiting execution and thus, if his sentence were now to be carried out, it would amount to cruel and unusual punishment.

Martin Evans of 33 Chancery Lane and Dominic Lewis assisted local counsel in this matter.

The full judgment can be read here.

Latest news

The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More
Efforts towards Abolition: Our recent trip to Ghana
Read More
There is strong evidence Kenyans want abolition of death penalty
Read More
New research examines Kenyan attitudes towards the death penalty
Read More
As Africa rapidly turns away from capital punishment, is it time for Kenya to abolish this relic of a colonial past?
Read More
Challenge to the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago dismissed by UK Privy Council
Read More
Lescene Edwards's murder conviction overturned by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Read More
A punishment reserved for the poor and marginalised? New study shines light on the profiles and experiences of death row inmates in Bangladesh
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to Professor Nigel Eastman
Read More
Taiwan’s legislators hold the key to abolition as new research reveals the majority favour an end to capital punishment
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to Nancy Anderson
Read More
UK’s Privy Council set to hear important challenge to constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago
Read More
Indonesians’ support for the death penalty declines with more rigorous survey methods
Read More
The Kalisher Trust Legal Internship - Applications now open
Read More
World Day Against the Death Penalty - Women and the Death Penalty
Read More
People may change mind about death penalty, but government?
Read More
Dismantle the gallows! Sierra Leone becomes the latest country to abolish the death penalty
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work