Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Prabagaran Srivijayan

  • D.O.B: 16 November 1987
  • Singapore
  • Death penalty; mandatory death penalty

Prabagaran Srivijayan, a young Malaysian man, was found guilty of drug trafficking in Singapore. He was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty with no consideration of the individual circumstances of his case. After he had exhausted all his appeals in Singapore Prabagaran began legal proceedings in Malaysia. He was executed in 2017 with an appeal still pending before the Malaysian courts.

Prabagaran's story

On the 12th April 2012 twenty-five year old Prabagaran (“Praba”) was travelling from his home in Malaysia across the border to work in Singapore. He was driving an acquaintance’s car, which he maintains he had borrowed after falling behind on the instalment payments for his motorbike. Having passed customs at the Malaysia-Singapore border Praba stopped to fix a faulty window on the car. He was called into an inspection pit, the car was searched and 22.24g of diamorphine, more commonly known as heroin, was found concealed in the arm rest. In Singapore, anyone found guilty of trafficking 15g of diamorphine will be automatically sentenced to death, unless – following narrow reforms introduced in 2013 – they can prove that their role was limited to that of a drug mule, or “courier” and the Public Prosecutor certifies that they substantively assisted in the investigation.

Praba maintains that he had no knowledge of the substance found in the car. However, under Singaporean law, an illegal substance found in a vehicle will be presumed to belong to the driver unless they can prove “on the balance of probabilities” that they did not know anything about the drugs. The burden of proof is therefore stacked against the defendant.

The only people who could corroborate Praba’s story, the owner of the car and his friend who had suggested that he borrow the vehicle, were not called as witnesses at trial, even though Praba had identified the men and provided addresses for both of them. Without any witnesses called in his defence, Praba could only rely on his own oral testimony at trial. It was a case of his word against that of the prosecution. Despite his cooperation with the investigating authorities, Praba was not provided with a certificate of assistance which would have meant a life sentence could be imposed. He was found guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death in September 2014.

Appeals exhausted

Praba appealed unsuccessfully against his conviction and death sentence. We assisted his Singaporean legal team in bringing a constitutional challenge to the mandatory imposition of the death sentence, arguing that the new legislation introduced in 2013 did not go far enough to safeguard the rights of those facing the death penalty and that judges should have full discretion over what sentence to impose. The appeal was dismissed.

Having exhausted all his appeals in Singapore, we assisted Praba’s Malaysian legal team in bringing a Judicial Review Proceeding before the Malaysian courts on behalf of Praba and three other Malaysian prisoners also sentenced the mandatory death penalty in Singapore. Malaysia has a duty to take all reasonable steps to protect the life and liberty of all its citizens, including by making diplomatic representations on their behalf. We argued that Malaysia had so far failed in its responsibilities towards Praba and the the appellants, and was compelled to bring proceedings against Singapore in the International Court of Justice to protect the rights of its citizens.


Praba’s execution date was set while his proceedings were still pending before the Malaysian courts. A last minute application for a stay of execution was refused and Praba was executed before the Malaysian court had an opportunity to make a decision in his case.

Case Timeline

  1. Praba is stopped at the Singapore-Malaysia border and found in possession of 22.24 grams of heroin

  2. Praba is found guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death

  3. Praba appeals unsuccesfully against his conviction and sentence

  4. The Death Penalty Project becomes involved in the case

  5. A constitutional challenge to the mandatory nature of Praba's death sentence is dismissed

  6. Judicial review proceedings are commenced in the High Court of Malaysia and shortly after dismissed

  7. A Notice of Appeal is filed against the decision of the High Court of Malaysia

  8. Praba’s family receives notice that he will be executed in a week’s time

  9. An emergency application for a stay of execution is refused

  10. Prabagaran Srivijayan is executed

Latest News

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work