Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Wenceslaus James

  • Trinidad & Tobago
  • Death Penalty; mandatory death penalty

On 3 June 1996, Wenceslaus and his co-defendant, Anthony Briggs, were convicted of the murder of a taxi driver, Siewdath Ramkissoon, and sentenced to death,  the automatic punishment for murder in Trinidad and Tobago.

Over two decades on death row

Following his sentence, Wenceslaus would spend the next 23 years as a condemned prisoner, not knowing when his execution may be carried out.  On death row, he was subject to extraordinary conditions. In 1999, prison officers came to Wenceslaus’ cell and read out his warrant of execution. He was told Anthony Briggs would be hung and that he would then follow. Waiting in a cell opposite the gallows, Wenceslaus heard Anthony’s execution. For reasons still unknown to him, Wenceslaus was not executed that day.

Wenceslaus continuously sought to challenge his sentence. After exhausting his avenues of appeal in Trinidad and Tobago, Wenceslaus applied to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the UK, which is the final Court of Appeal for Trinidad and Tobago. Wenceslaus was refused permission to appeal and in 1998, Wenceslaus wrote to the Advisory Committee on the Power of Pardon asking for his death sentence to be commuted, however he never received a reply.

In 2002, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that a number of Wenceslaus’ fundamental rights were breached by the State during and after his trial, ordering that Trinidad and Tobago should abstain from executing him. Despite this, Wenceslaus remained on death row where he felt like a forgotten man. Some media outlets even reported he had been executed with Anthony Briggs.

Death sentence quashed

The Death Penalty Project first became aware of Wenceslaus’ story in July 2019. We then assisted Wenceslaus’ Trinidadian lawyers, Daniel Khan and Shane Kingston, who filed a constitutional motion challenging his death sentence.

On 8 June 2020, the High Court of Trinidad & Tobago quashed Wenceslaus’ death sentence. The Court held that carrying out Wenceslaus’s sentence after such an extraordinary amount of time would breach his constitutional rights. This was based on a legal precedent set by the JCPC in one of our early cases, Pratt & Morgan -v- The Attorney General of Jamaica [1994] which established that a prolonged period of detention under threat of execution amounts to cruel and inhuman punishment.

Wenceslaus will now be resentenced later this year, where it will be argued he should be given a term of imprisonment that allows for his immediate release in light of the unprecedented delay in his case.

Case Timeline

  1. Wenceslaus is arrested on suspicion of murder

  2. Wenceslaus is convicted of murder and given a sentence of death

  3. Court of Appeal in Trinidad & Tobago dismisses Wenceslaus’ first appeal

  4. Privy Council refuses Wenceslaus leave to appeal his conviction

  5. Anthony Briggs, Wenceslaus’ co-defendant, is executed

  6. Inter-American Court of Human Rights finds a number of Wenceslaus’ fundamental rights were breached by the State during and after his trial

  7. Court of Appeal dismisses Wenceslaus’ second appeal, after his matter was sent back for the Court to consider fresh evidence

  8. The Death Penalty Project becomes involved in Wenceslaus’ matter, assisting his local lawyers Daniel Khan and Shane Kingston

  9. High Court quashes Wenceslaus’ death sentence and orders he be resentenced

Latest News

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work