Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

The State v Lester Pitman

  • News
  • 18 Dec 2013

The death sentence formerly imposed on Lester Pitman has been commuted by the Trinidad Court of Appeal, but he has been ordered to serve a life term with a minimum of 40 years.

The Court of Appeal delivered its decision nearly 4 years after the matter was heard – a delay which the Court itself acknowledged was unacceptable.

The Death Penalty Project previously assisted Mr Pitman with his proceedings before the Privy Council, which, in March 2008, allowed his appeal against conviction and remitted the case back to the Court of Appeal for it to review fresh evidence that Mr Pitman might not have been fit to plead, or alternatively, should have had the defence of diminished responsibility open to him. (See further details here)

Evidence presented to the Court of Appeal in March 2010 by doctors Professor Michael Kopleman and Dr Jessica Bramham showed that Mr Pitman possessed a low IQ and as a result, suffered significant cognitive impairment. This evidence, therefore, questioned whether Mr Pitman was able to properly comprehend proceedings, or whether his arrested development was such that he was not fully responsible for the killing.

Although the Court accepted the evidence that Mr Pitman possessed an IQ below 70, it found that he was nonetheless able to participate in his trial, and that his responsibility was not substantially diminished for the offence.

However, given that Mr Pitman had spent more than 5 years on death row after he was first sentenced, the Court of Appeal acknowledged that no death sentence could now be imposed upon him and a life term was substituted.

Edward Fitzgerald QC and Alison MacDonald were instructed pro bono on behalf of Mr Pitman before the Privy Council, and assisted local counsel before the Court of Appeal. Dr Kopelman and Dr Bramham were also instructed pro bono to carry out assessments of Mr Pitman and to provide medical evidence to the Courts.

Read the full judgment.

Latest news

The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More
Efforts towards Abolition: Our recent trip to Ghana
Read More
There is strong evidence Kenyans want abolition of death penalty
Read More
New research examines Kenyan attitudes towards the death penalty
Read More
As Africa rapidly turns away from capital punishment, is it time for Kenya to abolish this relic of a colonial past?
Read More
Challenge to the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago dismissed by UK Privy Council
Read More
Lescene Edwards's murder conviction overturned by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Read More
A punishment reserved for the poor and marginalised? New study shines light on the profiles and experiences of death row inmates in Bangladesh
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to Professor Nigel Eastman
Read More
Taiwan’s legislators hold the key to abolition as new research reveals the majority favour an end to capital punishment
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to Nancy Anderson
Read More
UK’s Privy Council set to hear important challenge to constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago
Read More
Indonesians’ support for the death penalty declines with more rigorous survey methods
Read More
The Kalisher Trust Legal Internship - Applications now open
Read More
World Day Against the Death Penalty - Women and the Death Penalty
Read More
People may change mind about death penalty, but government?
Read More
Dismantle the gallows! Sierra Leone becomes the latest country to abolish the death penalty
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work