Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

The State v Lester Pitman

  • News
  • 18 Dec 2013

The death sentence formerly imposed on Lester Pitman has been commuted by the Trinidad Court of Appeal, but he has been ordered to serve a life term with a minimum of 40 years.

The Court of Appeal delivered its decision nearly 4 years after the matter was heard – a delay which the Court itself acknowledged was unacceptable.

The Death Penalty Project previously assisted Mr Pitman with his proceedings before the Privy Council, which, in March 2008, allowed his appeal against conviction and remitted the case back to the Court of Appeal for it to review fresh evidence that Mr Pitman might not have been fit to plead, or alternatively, should have had the defence of diminished responsibility open to him. (See further details here)

Evidence presented to the Court of Appeal in March 2010 by doctors Professor Michael Kopleman and Dr Jessica Bramham showed that Mr Pitman possessed a low IQ and as a result, suffered significant cognitive impairment. This evidence, therefore, questioned whether Mr Pitman was able to properly comprehend proceedings, or whether his arrested development was such that he was not fully responsible for the killing.

Although the Court accepted the evidence that Mr Pitman possessed an IQ below 70, it found that he was nonetheless able to participate in his trial, and that his responsibility was not substantially diminished for the offence.

However, given that Mr Pitman had spent more than 5 years on death row after he was first sentenced, the Court of Appeal acknowledged that no death sentence could now be imposed upon him and a life term was substituted.

Edward Fitzgerald QC and Alison MacDonald were instructed pro bono on behalf of Mr Pitman before the Privy Council, and assisted local counsel before the Court of Appeal. Dr Kopelman and Dr Bramham were also instructed pro bono to carry out assessments of Mr Pitman and to provide medical evidence to the Courts.

Read the full judgment.

Latest news

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work