Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Zimbabwe court declares corporal punishment on juvenile offenders to be inhuman and humiliating

  • News
  • 17 Apr 2019

On 3rd April 2019 the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe unanimously declared that imposing sentences of corporal punishment on juvenile offenders violates the constitutional protections for fundamental rights.

The Court found that corporal punishment – which entails an offender being blindfolded, tied down and then whipped on the buttocks with a cane, was “by its nature and effect … a humiliating assault on the inherent dignity of the person being punished.”

Caning adult offenders has been illegal in Zimbabwe since 1987 but remained lawful for offenders under the age of 18. On 26th September 2016, Willard Chokuramba, aged 15, was sentenced to receive three strokes of the cane following his conviction for rape. That sentence subsequently came under the scrutiny of the Constitutional Court. Delivering judgment, the Court referred to principles of international law that restrict States from using “direct applications of violence on the body of a person that cause acute physical and mental suffering to enforce moral values or correct behaviour” and to a growing international and regional consensus that corporal punishment amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment.

It firmly rejected the government’s position that caning was in Chokuramba’s best interests, because it saved him from imprisonment. Rather, the court found that “human dignity is inherent to every person all the time regardless of circumstances or status of the person” and that a punishment that is inhuman and degrading for adults cannot be converted into punishment that is acceptable for children.

The court emphasised that purely punitive punishments were not appropriate and urged the government to establish more rehabilitation programmes for juvenile offenders to better promote their welfare and reintegration into society.

Note to editors

The Death Penalty Project is an independent legal action charity housed and supported by London legal firm Simons Muirhead & Burton LLP. For more than 30 years, The Death Penalty Project has worked to promote and protect the human rights of those facing the death penalty.

The Death Penalty Project assisted local lawyer Tendai Biti in this case. Amanda Clift-Matthews (In-house counsel) was instructed pro bono.

In the last few years, The Death Penalty Project has provided ongoing legal assistance and advice to local lawyers in several other constitutional challenges including; (Makoni v Commissioner of Prisons & Anor) a challenge to the unconstitutionality of the cruel and inhuman punishment and violation of human dignity of life sentences without the possibility of parole; (Ndlovu & Gochera v Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs & Anor) a challenge to the constitutionality of imposing the death penalty on prisoners post-adoption of the new Constitution; (Chawira & 13 others v Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs & Anor) a challenge to the inhumanity of keeping prisoners on death row by reasons of delay.

Latest news

Privy Council clarifies the approach trial judges should adopt when explaining “intent” to juries in The Bahamas
Read More
International Women's Day Q&A: Women in Human Rights
Read More
Cayman News Service: UK court rules against closed-door legal hearing
Read More
Cayman Loop News - Justin Ramoon, sentenced for murder, gets go ahead for judicial review
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Privy Council refuses to allow Cayman Government to hold secret hearings in prisoner transfer case
Read More
Cayman Compass - Privy Council rules against secret trial for exiled killers
Read More
Cayman Marl Road - Privy Council refuses secret hearings in Cayman prisoner transfer case
Read More
NEW op-ed: Time to scrap capital punishment in Taiwan
Read More
Privy Council: Appeal dismissed amidst serious disclosure failings
Read More
James Guthrie, impressive barrister whose work in the Privy Council included a string of landmark cases – obituary
Read More
LATEST OP-ED: Hoyle & Jabbar - Death penalty doesn’t deter crime
Read More
New article in Kenya's The Star: Death row convicts in Kenya not threatened by penalty – findings
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - New research exploring socio-economic profiles of Kenya’s death row prisoners
Read More
Kenyan prisoners on death row weren’t deterred by the threat of the death penalty: new research findings
Read More
The Death Penalty Project pays tribute to James Guthrie KC
Read More
London-based NGO to challenge lawfulness of Guyana’s death penalty at CCJ
Read More
PRESS RELEASE - Guyana’s Court of Appeal refuses to declare the death penalty unconstitutional
Read More
The Conversation: 'Why has Kenya not abolished the death penalty? Habit and inertia'
Read More
Political and legal issues: reflections on our report launch in Kenya, Nairobi
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work